首页> 外文OA文献 >Effective communications regulation in an era of convergence?: The case of premium rate telephony and television in the UK
【2h】

Effective communications regulation in an era of convergence?: The case of premium rate telephony and television in the UK

机译:融合时代中有效的通信法规?:英国的优质电话和电视案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article explores recent problems with premium rate number service (PRS) use in UK participation TV, utilizing a regulatory convergence analytical framework. In 2003, the UK government created the communications convergence regulator, Ofcom, yet PRS regulation continued to remain the responsibility of PhonepayPlus (PPP), originally established in 1986. The article argues that Ofcom could have anticipated the problem concerning TV phone-ins, or at least reacted to adverse developments more quickly. PPP was unable to achieve this because of its regulatory culture and narrower focus. The consequences of the PRS saga have been significant. Damage to the reputation of the PRS business and commercial broadcasters has occurred. Citizen trust in public service broadcasting has been eroded. Regulatory remedies provided by Ofcom and PPP are likely to minimize future system abuses. However, that all PRS-in-TV regulatory activity has not been completely subsumed into Ofcom’s operational structure remains an operational anomaly.
机译:本文利用监管趋同分析框架,探讨了英国参与电视中使用保费率数字服务(PRS)的最新问题。 2003年,英国政府创建了通信融合监管机构Ofcom,但PRS监管仍然是最初成立于1986年的PhonepayPlus(PPP)的职责。文章认为,Ofcom可以预料到有关电视电话输入的问题,或者至少对不利的发展反应更快。 PPP由于其监管文化和关注范围缩小而无法实现这一目标。 PRS传奇的后果非常重大。 PRS商业和商业广播公司的声誉受到损害。公民对公共广播的信任已被削弱。 Ofcom和PPP提供的法规补救措施可能会最大程度地减少将来的系统滥用。但是,所有PRS-in-TV监管活动并未完全包含在Ofcom的运营结构中,仍然是运营异常。

著录项

  • 作者

    Simpson, S;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号